翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Battery "G", 1st Regiment Illinois Volunteer Light Artillery
・ Battery "H" 1st Regiment Michigan Light Artillery
・ Battery "H" West Virginia Light Artillery
・ Battery "I" 1st Regiment Michigan Light Artillery
・ Battery "I", 2nd Regiment Illinois Volunteer Light Artillery
・ Battery "K" 1st Regiment Michigan Light Artillery
・ Battery "L" 1st Regiment Michigan Light Artillery
・ Battery "L", 2nd Regiment Illinois Volunteer Light Artillery
・ Battery "M" 1st Regiment Michigan Light Artillery
・ Battery (band)
・ Battery (baseball)
・ Battery (chess)
・ Battery (crime)
・ Battery (electricity)
・ Battery (novel series)
Battery (tort)
・ Battery (vacuum tube)
・ Battery 223
・ Battery 9
・ Battery A, 1st Missouri Light Artillery
・ Battery A, 1st New Jersey Light Artillery
・ Battery A, 1st Ohio Light Artillery
・ Battery A, 1st Rhode Island Light Artillery
・ Battery A, 2nd U.S. Artillery
・ Battery A, 3rd Rhode Island Heavy Artillery
・ Battery B, 1st New Jersey Light Artillery
・ Battery B, 1st Ohio Light Artillery
・ Battery B, 1st Rhode Island Light Artillery
・ Battery B, 3rd Rhode Island Heavy Artillery
・ Battery balancing


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Battery (tort) : ウィキペディア英語版
Battery (tort)

At common law, battery is the tort of intentionally (or, in Australia, negligently〔 ''Rixon v Star City Casino'' (2001) 53 NSWLR 98〕) and voluntarily bringing about an unconsented harmful or offensive contact with a person or to something closely associated with them (e.g. a hat, a purse). Unlike assault, battery involves an actual contact. The contact can be by one person (the tortfeasor) of another (the victim), or the contact may be by an object brought about by the tortfeasor. For example, the intentional contact by a car is a battery.
Unlike criminal law, which recognizes degrees of various crimes involving physical contact, there is but a single tort of battery. Lightly flicking a person's ear is battery, as is severely beating someone with a tire iron. Neither is there a separate tort for a battery of a sexual nature. However, a jury hearing a battery case is free to assess higher damages for a battery in which the contact was particularly offensive or harmful.
Since it is practically impossible to avoid physical contact with others during everyday activities, everyone is presumed to consent to a certain amount of physical contact with others, such as when one person unavoidably brushes or bumps against another in a crowded lift, passage or stairway. However, physical contact may not be deemed as consented to if the acts that cause harm are prohibited acts.〔 ''McNamara v Duncan'' (1971) 26 ALR 584〕
==Contact required==
Battery is a form of trespass to the person and as such no actual damage (e.g. injury) needs to be proved. Only proof of contact (with the appropriate level of intention or negligence) needs to be made. If there is an attempted battery, but no actual contact, that may constitute a tort of assault.
In the United States, the common law requires the contact for battery be "harmful or offensive." The offensiveness is measured against a reasonable person standard. Looking at a contact objectively, as a reasonable person would see it, would this contact be offensive? Thus, a hypersensitive person would fail on a battery action if jostled by fellow passengers on a subway, as this contact is expected in normal society and a reasonable person would not find it offensive. Harmful is defined by any physical damage to the body.
Battery need not require body-to-body contact. Touching an object "intimately connected" to a person (such as an object he or she is holding) can also be battery.〔See, e.g. ''Fisher v Carrousel Motor Hotel, Inc.'', 424 S.W.2d 627 (1967).〕 Furthermore, a contact may constitute a battery even if there is a delay between the defendant's act and the contact to the plaintiff's injury. For example, where a person who digs a pit with the intent that another will fall into it later, or where a person who mixes something offensive in food that he knows another will eat, has committed a battery against that other when the other does in fact fall into the pit or eats the offensive matter.
Because courts have recognized a cause of action for battery in the absence of body-to-body contact,〔See, e.g., ''(Leichtman v. WLW Jacor Communications )'', 92 Ohio App.3d 232 (1994) (cause of action for battery where tortfeasor blew cigarette smoke in another's face).〕 the outer limits of the tort can often be hard to define. The Pennsylvania Superior Court attempted to provide some guidance in this regard in ''Herr v. Booten''〔580 A.2d 1115 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1990).〕 by stressing the importance of the concept of one's personal dignity. In that case, college students purchased and provided their friend with alcohol on the eve of his twenty-first birthday. After drinking nearly an entire bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey, the underage man died of acute ethanol poisoning. Reversing the decision of the trial court, the Pennsylvania Superior Court held that supplying a minor with alcoholic beverages, while certainly constituting a negligent act, did not rise to the level of a battery. In the words of Judge Montemuro, supplying a person with alcohol "is not an act which impinges upon that individual's sense of physical dignity or inviolability."〔Id. at 1117.〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Battery (tort)」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.